Pensions Regulations

Oral Answers to Questions — Police Force – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 23 June 1949.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Mr Albert Bechervaise Mr Albert Bechervaise , Leyton East 12:00, 23 June 1949

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, in view of the fact that serving policemen are to be required to express an option as to whether they accept or refuse averaging of pay for the purposes of pension, he will give an assurance that those members of the service who joined before 5th July, 1948, who opt to accept averaging will retain their safeguard under Section 2 of the Police Pensions Act, 1948.

Photo of Mr Kenneth Younger Mr Kenneth Younger , Grimsby

Yes, Sir. My right hon. Friend is advised that officers who are members of police forces on 1st July, 1949, and who elect, under Regulation 87 of the draft Police Pensions Regulations now before Parliament, to have their pensions based on the average of their pay for the three years preceding retirement retain the safeguard contained in Section 2 of the Police Pensions Act, 1948, in relation to any future amendments of the Police Pensions Regulations.

Photo of Mr Albert Bechervaise Mr Albert Bechervaise , Leyton East

Does that mean that the officers opting for averaging, who were in the force prior to 5th July, 1948, and have been promoted late in their careers, will receive pensions appropriate to their rank?

Photo of Mr Kenneth Younger Mr Kenneth Younger , Grimsby

This provision for opting has been introduced to ensure that on this occasion when the pensions regulations are altered, there should be no possible question of infringement of the safeguard introduced last year.

Photo of Viscount  Turnour Viscount Turnour , Horsham

In view of the great interest taken in this question, quite apart from any political point of view, will the Under-Secretary look into the terms of the order which his right hon. Friend is moving on Tuesday next, to see whether words cannot be added, to bring into Order discussion of the sort of points which have been raised on this question, and which show that the House has considerable doubt as to what is to be effected?

Photo of Mr Kenneth Younger Mr Kenneth Younger , Grimsby

I appreciate the point, but what would or would not be in Order in that Debate is a mater on which I cannot answer.