– in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 12 August 1947.
Viscount Turnour
, Horsham
12:00,
12 August 1947
(By Private Notice) asked the Chancellor of the exchequer if, in view of the allegation made by certain film producers in the U.S. that the new tax on U.S. films entering this country is a violation of the Loan Agreement, he has any statement to make on the subject.
This is the Question of which I gave Private Notice yesterday, and which through no fault either of the Department concerned or myself, could not be answered yesterday—namely, to ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he has any statement to make upon the effects of the retaliation by the United States film industry against the new tax on United States films entering this country as being a violation of the Loan Agreement.
Mr Hugh Dalton
, Bishop Auckland
None, Sir, beyond saying that I do not accept this allegation.
Viscount Turnour
, Horsham
In view of the fact that reasonable opinion on both sides of the Atlantic agrees that it is necessary, so to speak, to dam the flow of dollars for this purpose, and that, as the fight hon. Gentleman is aware, there was discussion on a high level, both through the Government and the trade interests, on both sides of the Atlantic, to find a compromise, can the right hon. Gentleman now give an undertaking that between now and the introduction of the quota Bill, efforts will be made to rediscuss this matter, in view of the fact that whatever may be the view of the right hon. Gentleman or his supporters, we do not want to upset our relations with America?
Mr Hugh Dalton
, Bishop Auckland
No doubt this will be one of many matters on which the United States Government may wish to express their views to us, and there are many on which we wish to express our views to them, but I am sure the noble Lord is right in saying that it is the opinion of all of us that we really must restrict severely and drastically the flow of dollars for this particular purpose.
Hon. Oliver Stanley
, Bristol West
What is the position of the tax at the moment, in view of the fact that it requires an affirmative Resolution, and no affirmative Resolution will be passed by this House before we adjourn? Is the tax in operation or not?
Mr Hugh Dalton
, Bishop Auckland
An order was made on 7th August under the procedure with which the House is familiar, imposing this duty. As my right hon. Friend the Financial Secretary said in the course of the Debate, the Government undertake that this shall be subject to affirmative Resolution, again according to our ordinary procedure. The rule is—and I have verified this—that within 28 sitting days from the moving of the Order, the affirmative Resolution must be passed, failing which the tax lapses. Meanwhile the tax is legally in operation. But, in fact, owing to the decision of the American film producers not to send further films at present to this country, though it is legally in operation, it is not operating upon any inflow of films at the present time.
Mr Benn Levy
, Eton and Slough
Is my right hon. Friend aware that if anybody else had even seemed to suggest that the course of British legislation should be deflected by threats from Hollywood, the noble Lord would have been the very first to be vociferously shocked?
Mr Douglas Clifton Brown
, Hexham
I did not quite understand the point of that question. Questions should be asked for obtaining information.
Mr Benn Levy
, Eton and Slough
The point of the question, surely, centres upon the word "retaliation" which is the threat that prompted the noble Lord to raise this matter.
Viscount Turnour
, Horsham
I must ask your permission, Mr. Speaker, to make a personal explanation. The hon. Member for Eton and Slough (Mr. Levy), in the guise of a question, brought a wounding charge against me, and I must ask the protection of the Chair against this charge, which is totally unfounded.
Mr Douglas Clifton Brown
, Hexham
I thought I had pointed out that the question was quite unnecessary. I will be quite frank with the House. I very much deprecate questions from any side of the House which are asked in order to annoy any hon. Member. After all, questions should be asked to obtain information and not to create spite.
Mr Benn Levy
, Eton and Slough
May I make it perfectly plain that the intention of my question was certainly not to annoy the noble Lord? I ask to be believed on that. As a matter of fact, I thought I had put it in a fairly complimentary way when I said that the noble Lord would be the very first to be shocked by such a thing, which I believe to be true. I raised the matter because it seemed to me to be one of serious public importance, and that it should be made clear that threats from Hollywood, such as have been broadcast in the papers, should be completely ignored by this House.
Mr Douglas Clifton Brown
, Hexham
I hope honour is satisfied on both sides of the House.
The chancellor of the exchequer is the government's chief financial minister and as such is responsible for raising government revenue through taxation or borrowing and for controlling overall government spending.
The chancellor's plans for the economy are delivered to the House of Commons every year in the Budget speech.
The chancellor is the most senior figure at the Treasury, even though the prime minister holds an additional title of 'First Lord of the Treasury'. He normally resides at Number 11 Downing Street.
The Chancellor - also known as "Chancellor of the Exchequer" is responsible as a Minister for the treasury, and for the country's economy. For Example, the Chancellor set taxes and tax rates. The Chancellor is the only MP allowed to drink Alcohol in the House of Commons; s/he is permitted an alcoholic drink while delivering the budget.
The Speaker is an MP who has been elected to act as Chairman during debates in the House of Commons. He or she is responsible for ensuring that the rules laid down by the House for the carrying out of its business are observed. It is the Speaker who calls MPs to speak, and maintains order in the House. He or she acts as the House's representative in its relations with outside bodies and the other elements of Parliament such as the Lords and the Monarch. The Speaker is also responsible for protecting the interests of minorities in the House. He or she must ensure that the holders of an opinion, however unpopular, are allowed to put across their view without undue obstruction. It is also the Speaker who reprimands, on behalf of the House, an MP brought to the Bar of the House. In the case of disobedience the Speaker can 'name' an MP which results in their suspension from the House for a period. The Speaker must be impartial in all matters. He or she is elected by MPs in the House of Commons but then ceases to be involved in party politics. All sides in the House rely on the Speaker's disinterest. Even after retirement a former Speaker will not take part in political issues. Taking on the office means losing close contact with old colleagues and keeping apart from all groups and interests, even avoiding using the House of Commons dining rooms or bars. The Speaker continues as a Member of Parliament dealing with constituent's letters and problems. By tradition other candidates from the major parties do not contest the Speaker's seat at a General Election. The Speakership dates back to 1377 when Sir Thomas Hungerford was appointed to the role. The title Speaker comes from the fact that the Speaker was the official spokesman of the House of Commons to the Monarch. In the early years of the office, several Speakers suffered violent deaths when they presented unwelcome news to the King. Further information can be obtained from factsheet M2 on the UK Parliament website.
