Oral Answers to Questions — British Army – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 12 August 1947.
Sir Toby Low
, Blackpool North
12:00,
12 August 1947
asked the Secretary of State for War how many of those who are at present serving on normal Regular engagements and on short-service engagements, respectively, are serving in the R.A., R.A.C., R.E., Royal Signals or infantry; and how many in other branches of the Services.
Mr Frederick Bellenger
, Bassetlaw
It would be contrary to present policy to give information about the detailed composition of the army.
Sir Toby Low
, Blackpool North
Does not the right hon. Gentleman remember that his hon. Friend the Parliamentary Secretary gave that information for the whole of the army when replying to the Debate on the Army Estimates? Why is it, if his hon. Friend is allowed to give the figure for the whole of the Army, he is not allowed to give it for a part of the Army? Does that not make nonsense?
Mr Frederick Bellenger
, Bassetlaw
I should not like to reply to that observation without examining what my hon. Friend said.
Viscount Turnour
, Horsham
Is there any precedent, in relation to any previous war, that two years after it has ended, information which has always been available to the House has not been given? Will the right hon. Gentleman give some reason?
Mr Frederick Bellenger
, Bassetlaw
The noble Lord will know that I have undertaken to see whether more information can be given in the Estimates next year. I am looking into that now, but I must remind the right hon. Gentleman that although before the war we gave a lot of information which was of value to the House, it was also of value to those outside the House.
Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.