Control Commission

Oral Answers to Questions — Germany – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 12 May 1947.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Sir Waldron Smithers Sir Waldron Smithers , Orpington 12:00, 12 May 1947

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what is the number of the British personnel in Germany at the latest available date, giving services and civilians separately.

Mr. McNeil:

On 19th April the British Element of the Control Commission employed 19,050 civilians and 3,410 Service personnel in Germany.

Photo of Sir Waldron Smithers Sir Waldron Smithers , Orpington

Why is it that the civilian personnel get better pay and treatment than the Service personnel? Further, is it not a fact that our work of reconstruction is being seriously hampered by Soviet activities?

Mr. McNeil:

I cannot see how the second point arises from this Question. As to the first part of the supplementary question, there are many grades within distinct categories; if the hon. Member has any detailed inquiries to make, perhaps he will put them down.

Photo of Sir Waldron Smithers Sir Waldron Smithers , Orpington

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if he has considered the report which has been sent to him about the unsatisfactory conditions of control in Germany and consequent waste of British taxpayers' money; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. McNeil:

I presume that the hon. Gentleman is referring to the letter he sent to my right hon. Friend on 3rd May. My right hon. Friend will naturally reply to the letter in the normal way as soon as inquiries have been made.

Photo of Sir Waldron Smithers Sir Waldron Smithers , Orpington

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that I have first-hand information that some of the personnel are quite unfit for the job, and that some mem- bers of the Control Commission are only there to have a good time, and, owing to their behaviour, are lowering the prestige of Britain in Germany as well as losing the respect of the Germans?

Mr. McNeil:

I am naturally most anxious at all times to offer all the information which is appropriate and possible in these matters, but I should think it singularly unfortunate if I singled out one letter from the hon. Gentleman opposite and made it the subject of a detailed reply to a Question.