Oral Answers to Questions — Premises, Portsmouth (Compulsory Purchase).

– in the House of Commons on 4th August 1942.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Admiral Sir Roger Keyes Admiral Sir Roger Keyes , Portsmouth North

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty whether he is aware that the Admiralty are now purchasing compulsorily a number of small dwellings in Portsea, Portsmouth, immediately adjacent and forming a salient into the Royal Dockyard under powers given by the Defence Acts and the Acquisition of Land (Assessment of Compensation) Act, 1919; that the price given thereunder to a dispossessed owner is the market value as at the date of the notice to treat; and, whether as the effects of the war in vulnerable areas like the city of Portsmouth have seriously deteriorated the market values, he will consider taking a fairer basis than depressed market values upon which to enforce the purchase of lands such as those referred to?

Photo of Sir Richard Pilkington Sir Richard Pilkington , Widnes

The decision to acquire the small properties which form a salient into His Majesty's Dockyard, Portsmouth, was taken in January, 1938. Prices for about half the properties concerned were agreed with their owners in 1938 and 1939, and contracts were made for their sale at those prices, to be completed when the owners were ready to give possession. The purchase of these properties has since been duly completed at the prices agreed. Agreements for the acquisition of the remaining properties had not been arranged at the time that the damage or destruction of many of the premises by enemy action made it urgently necessary, for reasons of safety, to clear the entire site. The Admiralty therefore compulsorily purchased the properties, in their damaged state, at their then market value, being advised that this was the right and proper basis in the circumstances of the case, but arrangements were first made with the War Damage Commission for all the premises to be surveyed, in order to conserve to the owners their full statutory right to compensation under the War Damage Act, 1941.

As I have already stated, the basis adopted was considered to be the right and proper one in the circumstances. I cannot at present say whether any other basis could be substituted, but I am having the matter examined and will inform my right hon. and gallant Friend of the result.

Photo of Mr Herbert Williams Mr Herbert Williams , Croydon South

Is not the basis of valuation for the purposes of the War Damage Act the valuation on 31st March, 1939, and not-any subsequent valuation?

Photo of Sir Richard Pilkington Sir Richard Pilkington , Widnes

That may be so, but it will be taken into consideration.