Oral Answers to Questions — Food Supplies. – in the House of Commons at on 1 October 1941.
Sir Charles Lyle
, Bournemouth
asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food the present annual cost of his staff needed to ensure the working of the egg distribution scheme; and what is the estimated loss hitherto under the scheme of imported eggs which have become rotten before reaching the consumer at all. or in an edible form?
Major Lloyd George:
The present estimated annual cost of the Ministry's staff engaged on eggs is £145,000. In addition to the work in connection with the egg distribution scheme, this staff also deals with the importation and distribution of frozen eggs and dried and processed eggs. Since the introduction of the egg scheme the total allowances made in respect of bad imported eggs amount to £98,154, representing 5.3 per cent. on U.S.A. eggs; 5.8 per cent. on Canadian eggs and 1.75 per cent. on Eire eggs.
Sir Charles Lyle
, Bournemouth
Is not £145,000 a very high price to pay for three doubtful eggs per month?
Sir Charles Lyle
, Bournemouth
Would it not be much cheaper to import the feeding-stuffs which are necessary? Would it not be much more efficient and would we not possibly get some fresher eggs?
Major Lloyd George:
Of course, that has occurred to us, but there is very great doubt as to whether it is not better to import eggs rather than feeding-stuffs. My hon. Friend is assuming that if we did import more feeding-stuffs, they would of necessity go to poultry keepers, but that is not by any means so. We weighed up the advantages of importing this commodity or that, and we came to the conclusion that it is better to import the finished article.
Commander Sir Archibald Southby
, Epsom
Might not the Ministry come down on the side of fresh eggs rather than bad eggs?