Does it not appear from that answer that the writer of the article was asked to delete his own views, although they were unobjectionable, and to substitute for them the views of His Majesty's Government; and is it not a very strange form of censorship under which the Government say to a writer that they cannot allow his own views to appear but that they will be very glad to avail themselves of the prestige and authority attaching to his name in order to promulgate the views of the Government although these are opposed to his own?