(by Private Notice)asked the Minister of Transport whether he can give the House any further information regarding the railway accident at Downham Market last week?

The House will already be aware, from reports in the Press, that this accident, which resulted in the death of four passengers, was caused by a collision between an express passenger train and a lorry at an occupation crossing. I know I am speaking for the whole House in expressing deep sympathy with all those affected by the accident. The Chief Inspecting Officer of Railways, who visited the spot a few hours after the accident, has been appointed to hold an inquiry on Thursday next.

Has the right hon. and gallant Gentleman's attention been called to a statement made on behalf of the company that they repudiate all liability in connection with the accident, and does he consider it right that that repudiation should precede the inquiry that is to be conducted?

The right hon. Gentleman will know that on this question of compensation the railway companies are liable under common law for injury, etc., and any statement made by the railway company disclaiming liability at this stage has no validity. The liability will have to be determined by common law.

Do we understand that the officer who is conducting the inquiry is an employé of the company which has already repudiated liability?

Most emphatically no; he is an officer of the Ministry of Transport.

Is it the case that the repudiation by the railway company is because of the short-period tickets?

I must be excused from making any further statement. We are holding an inquiry and I do not think I should say anything to prejudice that inquiry.

Will the right hon. and gallant Gentleman look into the position with regard to the short-term tickets, and if necessary will he introduce legislation to deal with the disadvantages of them?

I am fully aware of the position in regard to short-term tickets, but it does not actually arise here. I will certainly look into it.