Oral Answers to Questions — Trade and Commerce. – in the House of Commons at on 26 November 1934.
Sir George Mitcheson
, St Pancras South West
asked the President of the Board of Trade whether he is aware that the greater part of the coal used in the production of iron and steel is that used in the production of the primary forms of iron and steel; and whether, in order to provide more employ- ment in the coal mines in this country, he will take steps to restrict further the importation into this country of those classes of iron and steel goods which can be made efficiently in this country, but which are being imported in large quantities for the purposes of further processing?
Mr Edward Burgin
, Luton
If my hon. Friend's suggestion is that, for the reasons stated by him, the primary branches of the industry should be protected without regard to the interests of the finishing branches, I fear I cannot accept that view. In any case the question of any variation in the protection given to any part of the industry is a matter in the first place for the Import Duties Advisory Committee.
Sir Louis Smith
, Sheffield, Hallam
Would my hon. Friend give this matter further consideration if he should receive from those responsible for the iron and steel trade a definite assurance that prices would not be advanced in the home market if these duties were given?
Mr Herbert Williams
, Croydon South
asked the President of the Board of Trade whether, having regard to the fact that the imports into this country of pig-iron, steel blooms and billets, steel sections, steel bars, and steel wire after importation pass through further processes, it is intended to remove the duties on such goods on their importation into this country?
Mr Edward Burgin
, Luton
Any question of a variation in the duties payable on these goods is a matter for the Import Duties Advisory Committee in the first instance.
Mr Herbert Williams
, Croydon South
Do I understand that the Government are entirely debarred from taking any action on their own initiative?
Mr Edward Burgin
, Luton
No, Sir. The fact that the hon. Member's question asks that a duty should be taken off has not passed without notice and comment.
Mr Herbert Williams
, Croydon South
Having regard to the fact that the Parliamentary Secretary stated recently that the imports of these goods were not regarded as disadvantages in the circumstances, do I understand that he thinks that the duties ought to be removed?
Mr Edward Burgin
, Luton
The whole question of the removal or addition of duties is one for the Import Duties Advisory Committee, in the promotion of which the hon. Member took so active a part.