RUSSIAN Goons (IMPORT PROHIBITION).

Oral Answers to Questions — Trade and Commerce. – in the House of Commons on 10th May 1933.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Mr Cecil Pike Mr Cecil Pike , Sheffield, Attercliffe

32.

asked the President of the Board of Trade the total number of applications made and the total number granted in accordance with the provisions of licence contained in Part 2 of the Russian Goods (Import Prohibition) Act, 1933?

Photo of Mr John Colville Mr John Colville , Midlothian and Peeblesshire Northern

Sixty-seven applications have been received for licences under Section 2 of the Act. Eleven of these applications have been granted.

Mr. PI KE:

Can the hon. and gallant Gentleman say whether these licences have been granted in strict accordance with Part 11 of the Act and also give the reasons for those which have been refused?

Photo of Mr John Colville Mr John Colville , Midlothian and Peeblesshire Northern

The general criterion in dealing with applications for licences is whether payment for the goods imported had been substantially made before the date of the embargo.

Photo of Mr Cecil Pike Mr Cecil Pike , Sheffield, Attercliffe

Is there any truth in the published statement that a licence would be granted if evidence could be produced of payment having been made before the date of the Act coming into force?

Photo of Mr John Colville Mr John Colville , Midlothian and Peeblesshire Northern

I have indicated in my supplementary answer the lines on which the Government are proceeding.

Photo of Major Abraham Lyons Major Abraham Lyons , Leicester East

Can the hon. and gallant Gentleman tell the House the nature of the goods in respect of which licences have been granted?

Photo of Mr John Colville Mr John Colville , Midlothian and Peeblesshire Northern

Not in answer to a supplementary question.