– in the House of Commons at on 13 March 1929.
Lieut-Colonel Charles Howard-Bury
, Chelmsford
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he has had any further communication from the French Ambassador with regard to the Dead Sea concessions; whether any reply has been sent to the last communication; whether the grant of this concession in principle by the Colonial Office to Mr. Moses Novamesky offers an obstacle to a settlement by agreement; and how does the position now stand?
Mr Austen Chamberlain
, Birmingham West
The reply to the first part of the question is in the negative. As regards the second part, a reply is about to be sent to the French Ambassador's Note. I do not understand the implication of the third part of the question. No question of settlement by agreement has arisen. As regards the last part of the question, I have nothing to add to the replies which were given to the hon. and gallant Member for Abingdon (Major Glyn) on 4th March by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Colonies.
Lieut-Colonel Charles Howard-Bury
, Chelmsford
Cannot the right hon. Gentleman say whether it is the desire of the French Government to take this matter to The Hague?
Mr Austen Chamberlain
, Birmingham West
I cannot say. I do not think any decision on that point can be taken till they have had our reply to the French Ambassador's last letter.
Colonel Josiah Wedgwood
, Newcastle-under-Lyme
Can the right hon. Gentleman say what the French interests in the Dead Sea are?
Mr Austen Chamberlain
, Birmingham West
No I cannot. If further information is required, I must ask for notice. I think a question of that sort had better be put to the Colonial Office.
Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.