Part of Oral Answers to Questions — Unemployment. – in the House of Commons at on 6 February 1929.
Mr Arthur Steel-Maitland
, Birmingham Erdington
In this particular case, the House will not think that I want to argue the merits of the case, in which I have no power to intervene, if I say that there are many other circumstances in the case, one of which was that the claimant's main contention was that he was not feeling well enough for work on the day when he ought to Lave returned, but was not so unwell as to be ineligible for benefit.