asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty whether he is aware that advertisements are appearing offering for sale a large amount of plant collected for the construction of the naval base at Singapore; and, in view of the statements of the Prime Minister that the Singapore scheme is only postponed and in certain events will have to be proceeded with, will he reconsider putting valuable plant up for sale which may have to be re-purchased and which will involve the State in certain loss?

I am aware that the plant collected for Singa- pore naval base has been offered for sale. The contingency referred to in the Noble Lord's question has not been overlooked, and no offers will be accepted which are likely to involve the State in loss.

Is it fair to prejudice this matter, upon which another Government may take a different line?

In view of the pronouncement of the Chancellor of the Duchy yesterday that a debt of gratitude to Australia could not be considered in terms of pounds, shillings and pence, will the Government reconsider the whole matter?

In reply to the first question, the hon. Gentleman will observe there is no prejudice with regard to any future action. With regard to the latter question, everything said by my right hon. Friend will be borne in mind at the appropriate time.

What is the actual nature of the plant now offered for sale? Does it include any permanent dredger or other expensive material which could not easily be re-purchased?

It includes everything which would deteriorate by keeping. Otherwise we are not inclined to do anything which would involve us in loss and cost more to re-purchase later on.

Are we to understand that material which would not deteriorate by keeping is not being offered for sale, but is being kept?

Generally speaking, that may be accepted as right.