Non-Co-Operation Party.

Oral Answers to Questions — India. – in the House of Commons at on 29 May 1924.

Alert me about debates like this

Lieut. - Colonel Sir FREDERICK HALL:

47.

asked the Prime Minister whether the statement of the Secretary of Stale for India as to the desirability of the Imperial Government getting into closer touch with the Non-Co-operation party in India was made with the approval of the Cabinet; if he will state whether the Government propose to take action in the direction of an extension of Home Rule in India; and when he proposes to make a statement as to the Government's policy in this matter?

Photo of Mr John Clynes Mr John Clynes , Manchester Platting

I am not aware that the Secretary of State for India has made any statement in the language set out in the hon. and gallant Member's question. My noble Friend, with the approval of his colleagues in the Government, said in another place, on the 26th February last that His Majesty's Government were earnestly desirous of availing themselves of any disposition towards effective con sultation, and were open to consider any practical proposals for establishing closer contact and betters understanding. In reply to the second part of the question, the Government are not at present prepared to make any proposals for action in the direction of an extension of Home Rule in India.

Photo of Lieut-Colonel Charles Howard-Bury Lieut-Colonel Charles Howard-Bury , Wolverhampton Bilston

Is this an example of the new methods of the Government communicating Cabinet decisions to the people in India?

Photo of Viscount  Curzon Viscount Curzon , Battersea South

Are we to understand that the Government view with approval the action of the Secretary of State in communicating direct with this extremist leader in India?

Photo of Mr John Clynes Mr John Clynes , Manchester Platting

My Noble Friend has not made any statement in the language set out in the question.