Standing Orders.

Agricultural Wages Boards. – in the House of Commons at on 2 May 1923.

Alert me about debates like this

Resolutions reported from the Select Committee;

  1. 1. "That, in the case of the Wimbledon and Sutton Railway Bill, Petition for additional Provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to insert their additional Provision if the Committee on the Bill think fit."
  2. 2. "That, in the case of the Great Western Railway (Additional Powers) Bill [Lords], Petition for additional Provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to insert their additional Provision if the Committee on the Bill think fit."
  3. 3. "That, in the case of the London and South Western Railway Bill [Lords] Petition for additional Provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted o insert their additional Provision if the Committee on the Bill think fit."
  4. 4. "That, in the case of the North Eastern Railway Bill [Lords], Petition for additional Provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to insert their additional Provision if the Committee on the Bill think fit."
  5. 5. "That, in the case of the West Hartlepool Corporation Bill [Lords], Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the 1391 parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill."
  6. 6. "That, in the case of the Macclesfield Corporation Bill [Lords], Petition for additional Provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to insert their additional Provision if the Committee on the Bill think fit."

Resolutions agreed to.