Clause 2. — (Reinstatement Rights of Persons Voluntarily Extending Their Service Under Part I of National Service Act, 1948.)

Part of the debate – in the House of Commons at 12:00 am on 4 December 1950.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Sir Arthur Harvey Sir Arthur Harvey , Macclesfield 12:00, 4 December 1950

I support what my right hon. Friend has just said. There is a very strong case for accepting these Amendments. Three years out of a young man's life is a considerable period, but I think that in this instance he is getting a very great advantage out of this service: it helps him and it helps the Royal Air Force, particularly at a time like this, when there is a world crisis and the Service needs these men and can use every minute of their time.

There may be one or two employers who will not perhaps go so far as to give the assurance that is wanted. I should think there are very few indeed, but it would be better if the man himself knew that he was covered for reinstatement after his three years. In almost every case, when a firm takes a young man back after his service with the Royal Air Force, he is an infinitely better tradesman, or whatever it may be, than when he entered the Service.

The Air Ministry are to be congratulated on having arranged for this extra period of service. I understand that in most cases it is done in co-operation with the firm concerned, and that the men follow their original trade or calling. I ask the Minister to accept these Amendments. It is a small point, but it is one which may make all the difference in a young man's mind when considering whether he should give this service which the country now requires.