Justice written question – answered at on 27 November 2012.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what criteria were used to determine the shortlist for the competition for prison management for the Hatfield-Lindholme-Moorland cluster of prisons.
Bids for all six lots within Prisons Competition Phase 2 were evaluated to determine the most economically advantageous having regard to both price and non-price criteria. The evaluation methodology was published to all bidders before submission of their bids and includes the detailed criteria.
The high-level criteria and weightings are set out in the following table.
HMP/YOI Hatfield, HMP Lindholme, HMP/YOI Moorland | ||
Ref. | Level 1 | Section weighting (percentage) |
1 | NOMS Custodial Service Specifications | 10 |
2 | Custodial Services—Operational Resources | 5 |
3 | Custodial Services—Whole Prison Approach | 20 |
4 | Property and Facilities Management | 10 |
5 | Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and Information Assurance (IA) | 5 |
6 | Mobilisation, Transition and Transformation | 10 |
7 | Prison Industries | 20 |
8 | Legal/Commercial/Financial | 20 |
Total | 100 |
These criteria were further broken down into a series of sub criteria. The criteria are fully set out in the evaluation booklet which was published to all bidders. I have placed a copy of the evaluation booklet in the Library of the House.
Yes1 person thinks so
No0 people think not
Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.