Vetting

Home Department

Written answers and statements, 5 November 2009

Photo of Christopher Huhne

Christopher Huhne (Eastleigh, Liberal Democrat)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many and what percentage of (a) standard checks and (b) enhanced checks undertaken by the Criminal Records Bureau were the subject of a dispute by (i) the applicant and (ii) an employer in each year since 1997.

Photo of Alan Johnson

Alan Johnson (Home Secretary; Kingston upon Hull West & Hessle, Labour)

holding answer 12 October 2009

The table details the number checks undertaken by the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) which were the subject of a dispute since the launch of the disclosure service in 2002.

Information is not held to enable a breakdown of the number or percentage of disputes that relate to either the applicant or the employer.

Disclosure type
Total number of disputes Total number of disclosures issued Percentage of disputes
2002-03 1,111 1,437,094 0.077
2003-04 1,887 2,284,688 0.082
2004-05 2,291 2,430,937 0.094
2005-06 2,379 2,770,265 0.085
2006-07 2,112 3,277,957 0.064
2007-08 2,288 3,323,251 0.068
2008-09 2,509 3,855,881 0.065
2009-10 743 1,747,710 0.042

The contents of a disclosure can be disputed for a number of reasons, such as:

The record relates to someone with the same details as the applicant and based on the information available the CRB was unable to dissociate the applicant from the record.

Where locally held information is released the applicant feels it is either inaccurate, misleading or is otherwise inaccurate in the opinion of the applicant and as a result the police agree to amend the information.

Where someone has had their identity stolen or cloned.

CRB quality assurance procedures are targeted at eliminating errors. In 2008-09, the accuracy rate for CRB Disclosures was 99.96 per cent.

Annotations

No annotations

Sign in or join to post a public annotation.