Digital Broadcasting
Wales
Written answers and statements, 29 October 2009

Stephen Crabb (Whip, Whips; Preseli Pembrokeshire, Conservative)
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales
(1) what discussions he has had with telecommunications providers on the loss of ITV channels as a result of digital switchover in Wales;
(2) what discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport on the loss of ITV channels as a result of digital switchover in Wales.

Peter Hain (Secretary of State, Wales Office; Neath, Labour)
The "loss" of television channels to some viewers has occurred not because of the digital switchover, but because of a national re-tune. The Broadcasters decided to go ahead with the re-organisation of the Freeview platform in order to make space for the introduction of new technology to enable High Definition services on the digital terrestrial television (or Freeview) platform. It has also increased the availability of Channel Five to the point where it can now be received in almost all households across the UK—98.5 per cent. An estimated 500,000 Freeview homes will be able to see Channel Five for the first time after re-tuning.
Around 78,000 viewers in Wales, who receive their transmissions via a relay station, may have lost access to ITV 3 or ITV 4 following the re-tune but many viewers will of course have gained Channel Five and HD capability. These channels are not necessarily permanently unavailable as there are alternative means of accessing both. Viewers can find out how to do so by contacting Digital UK via their website at:
or the helpline on 08456 505050 or by investing in alternative platforms such as Freesat, cable or satellite—not all of which require a subscription.
Annotations
DAVID TAYLOR
Posted on 30 Oct 2009 1:11 pm (Report this annotation)
Peter Hain in his answer concentrates on the increased availability of C5 . That was not the question . C5 is not ITV . Since when was purchasing an alternative "platform" an "investment"? Many TV viewers who had previously "invested" in a receiver now have to reinvest. It is not clear whether this answer followed discussions referred to in the questions
