Crime: Databases
Home Department
Written answers and statements, 2 June 2008

James Brokenshire (Shadow Minister, Home Affairs; Hornchurch, Conservative)
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether she expects the National Ballistics Intelligence Service Database, the National Firearms Register on the Police National Computer and the National Firearms Licensing Management System to be able to share data.

Tony McNulty (Minister of State (Security, Counter-terrorism, Crime and Policing), Home Office; Harrow East, Labour)
The potential requirements for the sharing of information between the National Ballistics Intelligence Service Database (NABIS) and the National Firearms Licensing Management System was examined, and discussed, in detail by key stakeholders (including forensic and investigatory professionals) throughout the lifetime of the project management process.
It was found that the potential crossover between the data held by the systems was very small, due to the very low instances of legally held firearms being used in gun crime and the small overlap in information shared between the two applications. Furthermore, the data descriptors of 'firearms recovered at Scenes of Crime' and 'firearms being licensed' may be somewhat different and, as a result, inquiries would be passed from NABIS to expert firearms officers in the Licensing Departments. As a consequence, it was agreed that any risk of legally held firearms being used for criminal purposes was so low that given the difficulty of automating a matching process between systems, the cost of building such an interface would outweigh any perceived benefits.
The NABIS system has been designed to accredited police corporate data model standards, which means that information sharing may be possible in the future providing that there is a business case to do so.
Annotations
Tartan Giant
Posted on 3 Jun 2008 11:43 am (Report this annotation)
"the very low instances of legally held firearms being used in gun crime......"
Does not stop HMG robbing honest law abiding shotgun owners from paying stupifying licence/re-licence fees though. More checks and colour photos + £40 for a licence which does NOTHING to stop gun crime.
I complain at every renewal when 'they' ask me for my Date of Birth - as if I could change that!
Male/female.... with such a mental state if there was a change - take the gun away from any such person!
TG
Mike E.
Posted on 5 Jun 2008 11:43 am (Report this annotation)
Isn't this a great difference from ten years ago when it seemed that the government and the police believed that the risk definately DID come from legally held firearms?
In the iniquitious Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997, Section 39 imposed a national computer register of all people who had applied for, been granted, or had renewed a firearm or shotgun certificate. Note that NOTHING was said about anyone who had been convicted of a firearms offence, or who had had their certificates revoked or refused ! It shows the mind-set of that time.
