Results 1-7 of 7 for iraq speaker:Rob Marris

Opposition Day — [8th Allotted Day]: Iraq Inquiry (25 Mar 2008) has video

Rob Marris: I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for his graciousness. If the inquiry that he seeks through the motion took place and was completed before UK troops were withdrawn from Iraq, would he envisage a second inquiry?

Written Answers — Defence: Afghanistan and Iraq Road Accidents (30 Jan 2007)

Rob Marris: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many (a) deaths and (b) non-fatal injuries caused by road traffic accidents there have been to UK troops while serving in (i) Afghanistan and (ii) Iraq since 11 September 2001.

Written Answers — Defence: Troop Deaths: Afghanistan and Iraq (30 Jan 2007)

Rob Marris: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many UK troops have died while serving in (a) Afghanistan and (b) Iraq since 11 September 2001.

Written Answers — Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs: Iraq (Trade Unions) (26 Apr 2006)

Rob Marris: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations he has received concerning the independence of trade unions in Iraq; and if he will make a statement.

Public Bill Committee: Child Benefit Bill: Clause 1 - Persons for whom child benefit may be claimed: Great Britain (18 Jan 2005)

Mr Rob Marris: The hon. Gentleman will correct me if I am wrong, which I may be, but I suspect that he voted for military action in Iraq. Such factors as he has just delineated about uncertainty could have been outlined, and were outlined, at that point. However, one cannot foretell the future.

UK Forces (Iraq) (18 Oct 2004)

Mr Rob Marris: I salute the work of our troops in Iraq, but urge my right hon. Friend to treat the request with great circumspection for fear of putting them in greater danger. Can he explain how it is that, as he has repeatedly said, he is considering a request from the United States of America, when in theory earlier this year sovereignty was transferred in Iraq? Has there been any request from the Iraqi...

Public Bill Committee: Export Control: Clause 2 - Purposes of orders under section 1(1) or 2(1) (16 Oct 2001)

Mr Rob Marris: ...is opaque and misconceived. It is opaque because it does not describe what ``group'' means, unless it is defined later and I have not seen it. For example, a group of companies may have encompassed Iraq in the mid 1980s, and if the amendment were agreed, we would not be able to stop the transfer of technology there. The amendment is misconceived in that the fifth word in line 18 on page 1...