Here's the annotation you're reporting. Please enter a brief reason why you think it should be deleted in the form beneath. Thanks for your help!
Posted on 28 Mar 2012 5:19 pm
How on God's earth could the Hayes McKenzie Practice do an "independent report " for DECC when Hayes McKenzie were primarily responsible for ETSU-R-97? This is a disingenuous assertion by a technical illiterate.
Does Mr. Hendry take us for fools?
It is also noted that DECC personnel covered up knowledge from the public regarding noise from aero-generators [wind turbines], to give them their correct name.
Perhaps Mr. Hendry should lose a bit of sweat in researching the subjects for which he is a Minister.
Think Davis's of Lincolnshire, for a start and then go on the website of Nina Pierpont called Wind Turbine Syndrome. Also check what Dr. Chris Hanning has to say; he is the UK's sleep expert.
Why should this annotation be deleted?
Check our House Rules and tell us why the annotation breaks them.
This website is run by mySociety, the project of
a registered charity.
If you find it useful, please donate to keep it running.
Approximately once a month, spam free.