Andrew George (St Ives, Liberal Democrat)

Briefly, the purpose of the clause, as I understand it, is to repeal what the Department considers to be obsolete or spent enactments. I agree with the spirit of what is proposed, which is a clear cross-party commitment to reduce regulatory burdens on the private, public and voluntary sectors through the conclusion of the Davidson review, as the explanatory notes supporting the Bill explain. I could ask Ministers to address each of the measures, but I will not do so.

I am particularly interested in the most ancient of the enactments, the White Herring Fisheries Act 1771. I am told by those engaged in the industry that the Act was not so much about regulation or control as an enabling piece of legislation, which I am given to believe has aspects that are still extant and operational, particularly in Scotland, and that enable access to the white herring fisheries industry that might not otherwise apply if the Act is repealed. For that reason, I would welcome any advice—via any channel of inspiration—that the Minister can provide in order to furnish the Committee with an explanation.

Huw Irranca-Davies (Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Marine and Natural Environment), Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Ogmore, Labour)

I admit that I am stumped. The hon. Gentleman has beaten me on the White Herring Fisheries Act 1771. When I am defeated, I admit defeat. I do not have the information to hand, but I shall definitely consider the matter and write to the hon. Gentleman and other Committee members.