Hello: Join Democracy Club to help make this the most accountable general election ever!

Did you find what you were looking for?
Yes | No | Close

Clause 22

Finance Bill

Public Bill Committees, 2 June 2009, 12:45 pm

Finance Bill Next clause » « Previous clause


Provisions affecting amount of amusement machine licence duty

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)

Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)
Photo of Greg Hands

Greg Hands (Shadow Minister, Treasury; Hammersmith & Fulham, Conservative)

Despite the fact that clause 22 is a page in length, I only have to say that, as I understand it, it is a technical provision that aims to align the definition of the AMLD bandings with those used by the DCMS, as well as raising the limits. We have no particular objection to it.

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)
Photo of Angela Eagle

Angela Eagle (Parliamentary Secretary, HM Treasury; Wallasey, Labour)

The clause just makes certain that the benefit of this change goes to the people who are running the machines.

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)

Question put and agreed to.

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)

Clause 22 accordingly ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)

Ordered, That further consideration be now adjourned. —(Mr. Blizzard.)

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)

Adjourned till this day at half-past Four o’clock.

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)