Clause 10
Business Rate Supplements Bill
4:45 pm

Photo of Bob Neill

Bob Neill (Shadow Minister, Communities and Local Government; Bromley and Chislehurst, Conservative)

I rise on a genuine point of clarification. As I understand it, if the effect of the variation is that the BRS supports more than one third of the project cost, there must be a ballot. Is that more than one third of the total project cost as revised? What about a situation in which the variation might give rise to the BRS supporting more than one third of the variation? Should there be a ballot in those circumstances, if there is a shifting of the burden and an increase in the burden? I can conceive of such a configuration, depending on the rest of the funding.

Annotations

No annotations

Sign in or join to post a public annotation.