Clause 47
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords]
9:00 am

Next clause » « Previous clause Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill


Woman not to be other parent merely because of egg donation

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)

Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)
Photo of Mark Simmonds

Mark Simmonds (Shadow Minister, Health; Boston and Skegness, Conservative)

I shall again be quick. It would be helpful if the Minister would put her views on record. We talked about sperm donors under early clauses and this clause relates to egg donors. Can the right hon. Lady confirm that a record is kept of egg donors by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and that those who have benefited will have a right to discover who the egg donors were at the appropriate age? Will it be ensured that the information available for those aged 16 and 18 absolutely mirrors that in relation to sperm donors?

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)
Photo of Dawn Primarolo

Dawn Primarolo (Minister of State (Public Health), Department of Health; Bristol South, Labour)

I am happy to say yes. The hon. Gentleman is correct. The clause gives the access that he described, and it would have to, because the treatment would take place at a licensed clinic that was subject to requirements to trace the donor.

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)

Question put and agreed to.

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)

Clause 47 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Add an annotation (e.g. more info, blog post or wikipedia article)