Clause 35
Education and Skills Bill
9:15 am

Photo of Nick Gibb

Nick Gibb (Shadow Minister, Children, Schools and Families; Bognor Regis and Littlehampton, Conservative)

I beg to move amendment No. 187, in clause 35, page 19, line 1, leave out ‘, but need not,’.

This is a short amendment to question whether a phrase such as “but need not” in a subsection that gives a permissive power for a parenting order to include a particular requirement is proper legislative language. Clearly, if the provision gives rise to a permissive power rather than a requirement, it already is the case that the power need not be used. The phrase is tautologous and rather folksy in its drafting and, therefore, should be removed.

Annotations

No annotations

Sign in or join to post a public annotation.