Clause 4
Mental Health Bill [Lords]
10:15 am

Photo of John Pugh

John Pugh (Shadow Minister, Health; Southport, Liberal Democrat)

The hon. Member for East Worthing and Shoreham has made his statement defending the amendment—and I think it quite a legitimate statement—that someone who is suicidal necessarily has impaired judgment. I think that that is more or less what he said. I understand that Earl Howe in the other place has said the converse: that someone is not necessarily mentally impaired if they are suicidal. Have we not hit on a fundamental difficulty here, namely, that people who support this amendment derive different consequences from it? Before going any further, ought we not to clarify its true intended consequences?

Annotations

No annotations

Sign in or join to post a public annotation.