Clause 49
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill
11:15 am
Mark Prisk (Shadow Minister (Small Businesses and Enterprise), Trade & Industry; Hertford and Stortford, Conservative)
I beg to move amendment No. 35, in clause 49, page 28, line 40, leave out ‘relevant’.
This is a very simple probing amendment focusing on the meaning of the word “relevant”. My purpose is to clarify what a “relevant consumer” is. To my mind, all consumers who use energy supplies are relevant where redress schemes are concerned. Will the Minister tell us, therefore, who are not “relevant consumers”?