Clause 1 - Purpose
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill
12:30 pm
Christopher Chope (Christchurch, Conservative)
Since the Minister has manifestly failed to answer my last question on whether he would accept the introduction of “non-controversial” into clause 1(1)(b), perhaps he can respond to the following suggestion. In the light of his rather fanciful objection to amendment No. 29, would he accept as an alternative that the Bill should provide that there should be no change to a Law Commission proposal unless there have been changes to the law since the date of that proposal?