Clause 62 - National security
Equality Bill [Lords]
6:43 pm

Photo of Dominic Grieve

Dominic Grieve (Shadow Attorney General, (Assist the Home Affairs Team); Beaconsfield, Conservative)

One reason why I was wondering about that was that if the Secretary of State's certificate provides a national security defence or opt-out, why do we need clause 70 at all? Presumably, a case with a national security angle will never get into court in the first place. I wanted a bit of clarification on that. I can infer that a national security angle might suddenly emerge in a case and that the court might need to go into camera or to keep the claimant out. Seeing that the Government have given themselves extensive powers to provide for a national security opt-out, however, it would be helpful if the Minister could set out in his letter exactly how he expects the provisions to operate in practice.

Annotations

No annotations

Sign in or join to post a public annotation.