Clause 4 - Giving of fixed penalty notices by vehicle examiners
Road Safety Bill
4:45 pm
Mr David Wilshire (Assistant Chief Whip, Whips; Spelthorne, Conservative)
I am grateful to you, Mr. Pike. Although I have been in the House of Commons for a long time—some would say too long—I am still, as a layman, mystified by the process of legislation. I imagine Bills as determining something, as most clauses do. Clause 4 simply says
''Schedule 1 contains provision about the giving of fixed penalty notices''.
How riveting that is. What on earth do we need the clause for? It does not add anything to legislation or take anything away from it. It is self-evident that schedule 1 exists—I can find it. Do we really need signposts littered about legislation that say, ''If you look carefully, you will find schedule 1 further on''? In that case, why do we not have clauses that say, ''If you keep reading, you'll find clause 6 and schedule 9''?. It seems to me unnecessary.
The Minister is too nice and gentle a man to lecture me about being otiose, but his colleague in the Department is well used to using such abrasive language about anything that I suggest. Perhaps on this occasion, if the Minister spoke to the Minister of State, he would find him also saying that the clause is unnecessary.