Clause 69 - Contraventions subject to civil enforcement
Traffic Management Bill
11:15 am

Photo of Mr Brian White

Mr Brian White (North East Milton Keynes, Labour)

I have no problem with the clause moving road traffic contraventions from criminal to civil enforcement. In fact I support it and believe that it is the right way forward. The examples in the Bill seem perfectly reasonable. My problem arises from the discrepancy between the explanatory notes and the Bill. The explanatory notes to the clause say:

''Contraventions which would lead to licence endorsement may not be added to the list of moving traffic contraventions.''

However, that does not appear in the Bill, and concern has been expressed that the offences to be decriminalised might include safety-critical activities such as driving without a seat belt or without lights. Safety issues must also be taken into account. The hon. Member for Christchurch mentioned PACT, which says that offences that could lead to crashes should remain criminal offences.

The pattern of decriminalisation is reasonable, although it has been somewhat piecemeal over the years, but the clause could be used to extend it much further than is intended. It would be helpful if the Minister could give an assurance that that piecemeal approach will be stopped and issues of safety will continue to be criminal offences.

Annotations

No annotations

Sign in or join to post a public annotation.