Clause 3 - Citizenship ceremony, oath and pledge
Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Bill
Public Bill Committees, 30 April 2002, 6:45 pm

Mr Simon Hughes (North Southwark & Bermondsey, Liberal Democrat)
I think that the main debate will take place when we discuss schedule 1, because that opens the matter up. The issue here is whether the Government are right to think that there ought to be citizenship ceremonies, or whether there should be nationality ceremonies. We may have opportunities to address that later.
There is a much more intellectually high-powered argument. The Government have got into a bit of a muddle about whether we are deciding what a person should do to become a citizen, or whether we are talking about what one should need to do to become naturalised as a British national. I wonder whether the Government have thought this through, and whether they have got the language right. Have they talked to all of the relevant experts who think that they might have got the phraseology wrong with regard to international law? It is important to get that right, if we are to get the Bill as a whole right.
Question put and agreed to.
Clause 3 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Mr Eric Illsley (Barnsley Central, Labour)
Before I call the amendment to schedule 1, I think that it will be of benefit to the Committee if I indicate that I will seek to suspend for
dinner at or around 7 o'clock, and that the suspension will last until 8.30 pm.
