Clause 17 - Interpretation

International Development Bill

Public Bill Committees, 15 March 2001, 4:15 pm

Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.

Photo of Dr Jenny Tonge

Dr Jenny Tonge (Richmond Park, Liberal Democrat)

Would the Minister explain exactly what clause 17(2) means? I presume that it refers to refugees coming to and going from their country of origin.

Photo of Mr Chris Mullin

Mr Chris Mullin (Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Department for International Development; Sunderland South, Labour)

I am looking desperately for reassurance—and it is forthcoming. The answer is yes.

Photo of Mrs Cheryl Gillan

Mrs Cheryl Gillan (Chesham & Amersham, Conservative)

It would have been helpful if there had been some clarification about the clause in the explanatory notes, but I cannot find any.

Photo of Mr Chris Mullin

Mr Chris Mullin (Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Department for International Development; Sunderland South, Labour)

Clause 17 is fairly self-evident. It provides a general interpretation of some of the terms used in the Bill. I could go into more detail on subsections(1) and (2), but I believe that they speak for themselves.

Question put and agreed to.

Clause 17 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Clauses 18 and 19 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Schedules 4 and 5 agreed to.

Clause 20 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Schedule 6 agreed to.