Schedule 3 - Hunting with Dogs: Supervision
Hunting Bill
10:15 am
Mrs Marion Roe (Broxbourne, Conservative)
With this it will be convenient to take the following amendments: No. 106 in page 20, line 21, leave out `prove' and insert `claim'.
No. 107, in page 20, line 24, at end insert—
`( ) The prosecution must then prove that the person charged with the offence was not stalking a fox, hare or rabbit and the conditions in this paragraph were not met.'.
No. 108, in page 21, line 11, leave out `prove' and insert `claim'.
No. 109, in page 21, line 13, at end insert—
`( ) The prosecution must then prove that the person charged with the offence was not hunting rodents and the conditions in this paragraph were not met.'.
No. 110, in page 21, line 23, leave out `prove' and insert `claim'.
No. 111, in page 21, line 24, at end inset—
`( ) The prosecution must then prove that the person charged with the offence was not retrieving a rabbit or hare which had been shot.'.
No. 112, in page 21, line 27, leave out `prove' and insert `claim'.
No. 113, in page 21, line 31, at end insert—
`( ) The prosecution must then prove that the person charged with the offence was not searching for an animal which had been released from captivity or confinement, and the conditions in this paragraph were not met.'.
No. 114, in page 21, line 45, leave out `prove' and insert `claim'.
No. 115, in
`( ) The prosecution must then prove that the person charged with the offence was not searching for an animal which the accused believed was or might be seriously injured, and the conditions in this paragraph were not met.'.