Next speaker » « Previous speaker See the whole debate
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 3) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 87; Not-Contents, 147.
See this item in context
Posted on 19 Oct 2006 6:35 pm (Report this annotation)
Shame, as it seemed like a reasonable amendment and the Baroness is brave to keep raising the subject. If the proposed amendment serves no harm but only good, and there are no objections (rather only comments that the amendment proposes something which already can be done) then why not carry it?
A sad answer may be read in the clear split of voting by party line.
Sign in or join to post a public annotation.
This website is run by mySociety, the project of
a registered charity.
If you find it useful, please donate to keep it running.
Approximately once a month, spam free.