On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 3) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 87; Not-Contents, 147.

Annotations

mick angel
Posted on 19 Oct 2006 6:35 pm (Report this annotation)

Shame, as it seemed like a reasonable amendment and the Baroness is brave to keep raising the subject. If the proposed amendment serves no harm but only good, and there are no objections (rather only comments that the amendment proposes something which already can be done) then why not carry it?

A sad answer may be read in the clear split of voting by party line.

Sign in or join to post a public annotation.