Trade Union Facility Time
Oral Answers to Questions — Cabinet Office
11:30 am

Photo of Neil Parish

Neil Parish (Tiverton and Honiton, Conservative)

What his policy is on the provision of trade union facility time across the civil service.

Photo of Francis Maude

Francis Maude (Minister for the Cabinet Office; Horsham, Conservative)

Unions can play a positive role in the modern workplace. [Interruption.] On the subject of paying, it is nice to know who is paying that lot on the Labour Benches.

However, the Government believe that taxpayer-funded facility time arrangements in the civil service should reflect good practice across the private and public sectors. That is why I launched a consultation to review facility time, and will ensure that future arrangements are subject to rigorous controls and monitoring.

Photo of Neil Parish

Neil Parish (Tiverton and Honiton, Conservative)

Can my right hon. Friend tell me what arrangements for the monitoring of union facilities and activities were in place when he entered Government in 2010, and how much they were costing?

Photo of Francis Maude

Francis Maude (Minister for the Cabinet Office; Horsham, Conservative)

The arrangements for the monitoring of facility time were very mixed indeed, and in most cases almost non-existent. It has taken a long time—many months—to tease out of Whitehall the data on how much is being spent and how much facility time there is. We estimate that the cost to the taxpayer of facility time for trade unions in the civil service alone is between £33 million and £36 million a year. That is too much, which is why we are consulting on how it can be significantly reduced and controlled.

Photo of Gerry Sutcliffe

Gerry Sutcliffe (Bradford South, Labour)

When measuring the costs, the Minister should take account of not just the cost of the time to the taxpayer, but the benefit of the work done by trade unions throughout the civil service. How will he estimate the cost of what he is doing in terms of benefit?

Photo of Francis Maude

Francis Maude (Minister for the Cabinet Office; Horsham, Conservative)

I am confident that our consultation will tease out the benefits. I absolutely accept that the trade union duty to support union members in employment disputes can have a benefit, and for that reason we are not suggesting that all facility time should be removed; indeed, it would not be lawful for us to do so. However, the amount is excessive. It has been allowed to creep up over time, and it now needs to be reduced and controlled for the future.