Syria and the Use of Chemical Weapons

Part of the debate – in the House of Commons at 6:40 pm on 29 August 2013.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of John Baron John Baron Conservative, Basildon and Billericay 6:40, 29 August 2013

The JIC document states clearly that it cannot understand the “precise motivation”. The document is in terms of probability. I put this question to the House, and particularly to those who want to intervene militarily: what is the harm in waiting for the UN inspectors to come back and present their evidence? We should not forget that the west did its utmost to get those weapons inspectors to the site. At the very least we can wait a couple of days to see what they say after their due inspections. Otherwise, what was the logic of sending them there in the first place? Sending them there and not waiting for the report would not make sense.

The second question is of legitimacy. Is military intervention without a UN resolution legitimate?