Debate on the Address — [First Day]

Part of Outlawries Bill – in the House of Commons at 4:08 pm on 6 November 2007.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Vincent Cable Vincent Cable Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, Acting Leader, Liberal Democrats, Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Treasury) 4:08, 6 November 2007

I start by paying tribute to the dead firemen. Firefighters put their lives on the line every time they go about their duty. The same is true of our servicemen and women, to whom we shall pay proper tribute on Remembrance day this weekend.

May I add my tribute to Piara Khabra? He was not only the first Sikh Member of Parliament but the last Member of the House who served in our forces during the second world war.

I thank the promoter and seconder of the Loyal Address. Mr. Caborn is the ambassador—the tsar—for the 2018 World cup. If he is looking for venues, he need look no further than my constituency of Twickenham. My local football club, Hampton and Richmond, has a regular attendance of 250, but on Saturday it reached the heady heights of the first round of the FA cup. At the team's current rate of progress, it will match Chelsea and Arsenal in 10 years.

May I also thank Ms Butler? [Hon. Members: "Where is she?"] She is not here. She is clearly enjoying her stay in Parliament, but I fear that it will be a short one, because she will soon encounter my hon. Friend Sarah Teather—soon to become my formidable and popular colleague for Brent, Central—after which she can resume her no doubt valuable career as a trade union official. I also note from her website that the hon. Member for Brent, South describes herself as a spokesman for youth. It is rather nice to feel that somebody is speaking for me.

The Queen's Speech has been long in anticipation. The Prime Minister has been waiting for it for 10 years. He has had a 35-year political career distilling many of the ideas that have come forward today. He postponed the election in order to inject more vision, but the sense of anticlimax is deafening. We have heard little new, no ideas and little vision. Is that really what we were waiting for? I fear that the Prime Minister now cuts a rather sad figure. He was introduced to us a few months ago by his predecessor as the great clunking fist, but the boxing story has gone completely awry. Like a great boxing champion, as he once was, he has somehow made himself unconscious falling over his own bootlaces and is now staggering around the ring, semi-conscious and lost, and hanging on to the ropes. What is certainly absent is any forward movement or new ideas.

Buried in the Queen's Speech is the germ of a big new idea—a grand coalition of ideas between the Conservatives and Labour on policy. The Prime Minister was the author of the Red Book, to which I contributed, and has now written the Queen's Speech in the bluest ink. There are wide areas of policy on which Labour and the Conservatives have exactly the same position. They advocate the same tax policies with the same indifference to widening inequality; they are in the same love affair with the discredited council tax; they are both bidding for the anti-immigrant vote; they are both trying to prove how tough they are on crime by packing prisons with petty criminals, the mentally ill and people with addiction problems; they have both signed up to an energy policy that is centralised and depends on new nuclear power; they are both willing to sacrifice the environment for new airport development; they are both willing to load student tuition fees and top-up fees on to highly indebted students; they both have an obsequious relationship with the Bush Administration, which has led them to support the war in Iraq and new initiatives, such as the star wars programme; and they both sign up to a fundamentally unethical, cynical foreign policy that led them to get together at the beginning of last week for that little jamboree celebrating three decades of corrupt arms dealing with one of the most unsavoury regimes in the world.

Annotations

Pauline Campbell
Posted on 7 Nov 2007 6:15 pm (Report this annotation)

Vincent Cable, Lib Dem MP, raises important points regarding prisons, referring to Labour's [failed] policy of trying to prove how tough they are on crime by packing prisons with petty criminals, the mentally ill, and people with addiction problems.

There is something cruel about sending sick people to a place of punishment [eg the mentally ill]. This inhumane policy led to the death of my daughter in 2003. Severely depressed, with liver disease, and having lost two stone in weight in the weeks leading up to her trial, she was sent to Styal Prison, and locked in the segregation [punishment] block. Despite being on so-called "suicide watch", she was dead 24 hours later. It took the Home Office nearly 4 years to admit full liability for her death, along with an admission that her human rights were breached under the European Convention on Human Rights. Shame on Labour for their double standards and hypocrisy, and shame on the Home Office for not apologising for my daughter's death [which was not suicide].

Most people remain unaware of what happens behind the closed doors of our jails, but the following gives some idea: The Guardian, 27 September 2006, "Shameful admission", http://society.guardian.co.uk/crimeandpunishment/story/0,,18...