Recent comments

Most recent annotations on things by Lembit Öpik

  • Tony M: I am aware you take a keen interest in HM Forces Veterans issues. It is with this in mind that I would ask for your support to take the Veterans Badge to the next level. As you are no doubt... (22 May 2009)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Diane Quinton-Adams: "In order to help the private sector to deal with that situation, will the Government consider cutting the VAT that is paid on repairs to homes, potentially making the improvements needed... (25 June 2008)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Eleanor Davies: When in opposition did not the present government and the Liberal party take issue over Post Office closures with the Conservatives? If not - why not? Personally I cannot remember much being... (5 June 2008)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Francis Irving: He says "sixteen hundred" in the accompanying video, I think. So it's 1,600 (3 June 2008)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Meirion Bowen: Their crime levels are down because their server is blocking emails. Crimes are not being reported and resolved because emails are not only being blocked by Dyfed Powys Police but South Wales... (22 November 2007)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Cameron Bashford: Lembit... What a lad... for a looks challenged person, the aforementioned 'Cheeky' girlfreind is a good catch. L-A-D... Long live Lembit 'Cheeky' Opik... The lib dems real alternative...... (25 January 2007)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Withington Observer: What? No "jokes" about Bulgarian girlfriend or her family? Finally showing some decorum Lembit. Well done. Not something the Lib Dems in Withington and Manchester generally understand. But our... (25 January 2007)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Tom Morris: It's the right of the landlord to set whatever rules they wish on people entering their property. (30 March 2006)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Chris Broscomb: Possibly the most commonsense in the whole debate. There were alternatives to a total ban and yet they were never allowed into the chamber. There has always been freedom of choice and many... (30 March 2006)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Jenny Barnard: I agree that there are major difficuties for residents when the applications for masts just appear. There continue to be fears regarding health risks which are disregarded as being perception... (7 March 2006)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Paul Mitchell: Ronan, What an excellent idea! I hope Mr. Robertson has the time to join us. (2 November 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • ronan dodds: Thanks, Paul. I've also emailled Paul Robertson, paul.robertson@ncjmedia.co.uk , the chronicle's editor, as suggested. Find below a copy of that email. --- Dear Paul Robertson, During a... (2 November 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Paul Mitchell: Apology accepted, Ronan. Admittedly, I had to look up "glib" too just to be sure. :) (2 November 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • ronan dodds: I've just checked on a definition of glib, which lists one meaning as "Marked by ease and fluency of speech or writing that often suggests or stems from insincerity, superficiality, or... (2 November 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • ronan dodds: that should read ...'the powers police hold _over_ prisoners'. (2 November 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • ronan dodds: Paul I felt the implication was there in the language that you used, and give my apologies for any misunderstanding or offense caused. If we end up fighting here it spoils what is a great... (2 November 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Paul Mitchell: Ronan, At no point did I imply that you condoned that particular person's or anyone's behaviour. You raised his case as an example and I treated it as such. Regaring the Chronice article,... (2 November 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • ronan dodds: Paul, at no point have i tried to make an argument in defence of the lad's behaviour, so i'd appreciate knocking the 'poor little 14 yo' remarks on the head, as if i think he's pure as the... (1 November 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Ann Onymous: Why are people treated any diferently under the law for being under a certin age if they has not comited any crime, or even if in some cases like mine they have simply to protest against... (31 October 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Richard Heller: This is the first British government in history to criminalize childhood. Has made it a potential offence for a child to be in a public place, even if he or she is not misbehaving. Says something... (31 October 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Paul Mitchell: Ronan, I'm not appalled by that story but I am a little worried by it. Whilst it is the duty of the press to inform people of things that are in the public interest, this poor chap's... (31 October 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • ronan dodds: Quite, Ann. In fact, on the subject of discrimination against youngsters, I'm rather disturbed by this government's asbo policy which has been specifically designed to 'name and shame'... (31 October 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Ann Onymous: A comment on the above: Why is this blatent prejudice socialy acceptable? Not all under 18 have the mind of an infant. I am 14 and yet I consider meyself politicaly well informed and capable of... (29 October 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Richard O'shea: It is not a Human Right to vote. (29 October 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user
  • Richard O'shea: I do not accept that 16/17 should be given the right to vote. They are indeed children, physically and mentally yet to be fully formed. Does the MP truly believe that this power should be... (29 October 2005)
    Read annotation | All by this user